Paper reproduction signed by Cepea researchers is allowed provided the following is mentioned: author's name, author's professional qualification and affiliation to Cepea as well as the publication date on this page.

Agribusiness exportations to China: prices x exchange rate

The Brazilian agribusiness prioritized productivity, which has been increasing for several decades. This has conferred unique resilience to Brazil and agribusiness has displayed an average-standard growth, which encompasses distinct scenarios of commodities and currency exchange. This is clear when the evolution of agribusiness exportations is examined.


Agribusiness exportations have increased fast in the last twenty years, mainly to China, Brazil’s major commercial partner. From 2000 to 2016, the total amount exported by the sector increased 318%, while the volume allocated to China rose by almost 2,000%. This indicates that the fast demand increase from China played a very important role to absorb the increasing Brazilian production.


In the period of commodities boom, from 2002 to 2011, agribusiness exportations to China increased 450% and from 2011 to 2016, the rise was 57%.


China has imported mainly soy products. Soybean importations, which amounted for 12% of the total Chinese purchases in 2000, reached 75% in 2016. Soy oil importations, in turn, lost share in Chinese importations, from 35% to 1%. Forest products kept their share near 10% during these 17 years. Meats (beef, poultry and swine) have increased their share from 3% to 10%. China became the main commercial partner in agribusiness in 2008 and nine-folded its importance, from 3% of yield in 2000 to 11% in 2008 and 27% in 2016 (until September).


Observing the markets, nominal prices in dollar paid by China increased 65% from 2002 to 2011, according to data from MDIC, but quotes dropped 22% since 2011. These oscillations were absorbed by Brazil and China due to the variations of their respective exchange rates. In Brazil, from 2002 to 2011 (until September), exchange rate (Real/dollar) increased 63%, but from 2011 to 2016, Real also devaluated 63%. In China, exchange rate (yuan/dollar) was much more stable, having increased 25% between 2002 and 2011 and 2% from 2011 to 2016.


The behavior of dollar prices and exchange rates, in real terms, in both countries, pressed down agribusiness prices by 40% in Brazil in the boom period. These drops were recovered after 2011, increasing 28%. In China, prices of these products (in yuan) increased 24%, in real terms, in the period of price rises in the international market (2002 to 2011) and then prices dropped 20% between 2011 and 2016.


The period of price rises in the international market pushed up prices of products imported by China, despite yuan valuation against dollar, which may have led China to concentrate purchases to less processed products and with less added value. Still, Brazilian sales to China increased a staggering 450% from 2002 to 2011. However, after 2011, price drops (in dollar) have made Brazilian products cheaper and contributed to the continuous exportation increase of the Brazilian agribusiness.


If this interdependence between Brazil and China continues, it will be strategic, in case protectionism from important partners, such as the United States, increases and trading is reduced. According to the Brazilian agribusiness market, the USA imported nearly 7% from Brazil in 2016. The period after 2011, as the numbers show, is more favorable for both Brazilian exporters and Chinese consumers.  This result is apparently strange and may be understood when the exchange rates in each country are considered.

16/09/2020 - Rice price increases bring relief to producers, but it does not cover losses over the last 5 crops - Mauro Osaki e Renato Garcia Ribeiro 03/09/2020 - Changes in consumption habits during quarantine may remain after social isolation - Fernanda Geraldini Palmieri 17/08/2020 - Covid-19 crisis affects cassava sector in different ways - Fábio Isaías Felipe 04/08/2020 - Rural Brazil: Covid-19, income and emergency aid - Nicole Rennó Castro and Geraldo Sant'Ana de Camargo Barros 28/07/2020 - Limited demand due to covid-19 presses down ethanol quotes, despite lower production - Ivelise Rasera Bragato Calcidoni 01/07/2020 - Blitzkrieg on agribusiness: what to expect? - Heloisa Lee Burnquist 30/06/2020 - Chinese purchases from Brazil create optimism and alerts - Thiago Bernardino de Carvalho 26/06/2020 - Covid-19: opportunities and challenges for the fruit and vegetable sector - Margarete Boteon 24/06/2020 - Agribusiness, pandemics and the world economy - Geraldo Barros 22/05/2020 - Covid-19 and the agricultural input market - Mauro Osaki 22/04/2020 - Agribusiness exports during coronavírus pandemic - Andreia de Oliveira Adami 17/04/2020 - Economic epidemiology in evidence - Sílvia Helena Galvão de Miranda 31/03/2020 - Family company survival depends on efficient succession - Gabriela Garcia Ribeiro 13/02/2020 - Risk of planting second crop reduces area use in South Brazil - Lucilio Rogerio Aparecido Alves 21/01/2020 - Attractiveness of cattle farming in Brazil - Thiago Bernardino de Carvalho

Preencha o formulário para realizar o download
Deseja receber informações do Cepea?

Type this code in the field next to